"PENALTY"
PROVISIONS BARRED IN RELEASES OF ADEA CLAIMS
A new EEOC rule imposes
additional restrictions on releases of claims under the federal Age
Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), effective January 10,
2001. Under the new rule, an ADEA release may not include any of the
following penalty provisions: (1) a requirement to "tender
back" any benefits, such as cash payments, before the claimant may
challenge the release; (2) an obligation to pay the employer's
attorney fees if the challenge to the release is unsuccessful; (3)
a payment of damages to the employer for an unsuccessful challenge;
or (4) a clause permitting the employer to abrogate its obligations
under the agreement (that is, the commitment to make severance payments)
if the employee challenges the release.
These new restrictions on
releases of age claims are in addition to those specific requirements
imposed by the Older Worker Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) and routinely
followed over the past few years. Such previously existing
requirements include the admonition to an employee to consult with an
attorney, the 21 day period to consider a release, and the seven day
revocation period.
The EEOC adopted the new
rule in response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Oubre v.
Entergy Operations, Inc., 522 U.S. 422 (1998). In Oubre, the
Court held that an employee need not "tender back" a cash
payment received for signing an ADEA release before bringing a
lawsuit challenging the release. Applying the Oubre rationale,
the EEOC concluded that other penalty provisions frequently found in
waivers and releases, such as the attorney fee, damages, or abrogation
of obligations provisions, had the same effect as the tender back
requirement of discouraging older workers from exercising their ADEA
rights.
Our
recommendation:
Technicalities aside,
valid releases are a potent answer to age claims by former
employees. We recommend that employers who include any of the
prohibited penalty provisions in a general waiver and release form add a
disclaimer that such provisions do not apply to the release of ADEA
claims. The EEOC has suggested that if any prohibited penalty provisions
are included in a release, not only are such provisions void, but
their mere inclusion may invalidate the release of the ADEA claim.
More information:
More information about the
new rules can be obtained at the following websites: http://www.eeoc.gov/regs/tenderback.html and
http://www.eeoc.gov/regs/tenderback-qanda.html.
If you have any questions regarding
this issue, call or email us. Feel free to share this advisory with
others. If you would like to be on our e-mail distribution list, please
visit our Email Advisory web page and click on the "Subscribe"
button.
Disclaimer: The materials
available on this web site are for informational purposes only. Nothing
on this site should be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is
important that you consult an experienced attorney concerning your
particular factual situation. Do not rely solely on the information
provided on this web site.
©
2001 Newcomb, Sabin, Schwartz & Landsverk, LLP.
Use
and Disclaimer